Skip to content
Structured comparison · May 2026

SME NAS 2026: Synology vs QNAP vs Asustor.

Comparison of the 3 SME NAS vendors. OS, security, backup, performance, pricing.

Synology (Taiwan)

Synology RS / DS Plus

SMEs with 5-200 users, demanding security + simplicity

~€600-2,000 excl. tax (4-12 bay models)
+ Strengths
  • ✓DSM 7.2: the most polished NAS OS on the market
  • ✓Native immutable BTRFS snapshots (anti-ransomware)
  • ✓Active Backup for Business free (Win/M365/Workspace/VMware)
  • ✓Maintained apps: Drive, Photos, Office, Surveillance
  • ✓Security: mandatory admin MFA, built-in Security Advisor
  • ✓Hyper Backup to cloud (S3, Azure, B2, Drive)
  • ✓Excellent documentation
− Limitations
  • −Less powerful hardware than QNAP at an equivalent price
  • −10 GbE options often on high-end models only
  • −Third-party apps (Docker, etc.) less extensive
Ideal for

SMEs with 5-50 seats and no CISO, demanding security + operational simplicity

QNAP (Taiwan)

QNAP TS / TVS

SMEs with 10-200 users, media / virtualization use cases

~€500-1,800 excl. tax (4-12 bay models)
+ Strengths
  • ✓Hardware often more powerful at an equivalent price
  • ✓Built-in 10 GbE on more models
  • ✓Integrated GPU for video transcoding (Plex, Surveillance)
  • ✓Rich Virtualization Station + Container Station
  • ✓Versatile Hybrid Backup Sync
  • ✓High-performance Snapshot Manager
− Limitations
  • −QTS 5.x cluttered interface, redundant multi-apps
  • −History of ransomware incidents (DeadBolt 2022, Qlocker 2021)
  • −Security updates sometimes lag behind Synology
  • −Larger attack surface (services enabled by default)
Ideal for

Media studio, heavy video surveillance, homelab, IT virtualization

Asustor (Taiwan, ASUS)

Asustor Lockerstor / AS

SMEs with 5-100 users, budget alternative to Syno/QNAP

~€450-1,600 excl. tax
+ Strengths
  • ✓Aggressive price/performance ratio (often -15-20% vs Syno)
  • ✓Solid hardware (Intel Atom + sometimes Ryzen)
  • ✓ADM 4.x modern interface
  • ✓MyArchive: encrypted removable disk (USB-style)
  • ✓Btrfs + ZFS compatible (depending on models)
  • ✓3-year warranty often included
− Limitations
  • −Smaller community than Syno/QNAP
  • −Fewer maintained business apps
  • −More spartan documentation
  • −Less reliable distribution in Europe
Ideal for

Budget-constrained SMEs, standard file + backup use, self-sufficient IT team

Detailed comparison table

CriterionSynologyQNAPAsustor
OSDSM 7.2QTS 5.xADM 4.x
File systemBTRFS (snapshots)ext4 / ZFSBtrfs + ZFS (high-end models)
Immutable snapshotsYes (BTRFS)Yes (Snapshot Manager)Yes (Btrfs)
Mandatory admin MFAYesOptionalOptional
Security update responsivenessExcellentVariableGood
Win/Mac/Linux backupActive Backup freeHybrid Backup SyncABackup
M365 / Workspace backupActive Backup includedBoxafeLimited
VMware/vSphere backupActive Backup VMHybrid Backup VMLimited
Cloud sync (S3/Azure/Drive)Hyper BackupHBS3DataSync
Container virtualizationContainer ManagerContainer Station + Virt StationDocker
IP video surveillanceSurveillance Station (8 cameras free)QVR ProSurveillance Center
10 GbEHigh-end modelsMore accessibleDepending on models
Standard warranty3 years2 years (paid extension)3 years

Recommendation by profile

Standard SME, 5-50 seats

→ Synology DSM

The most secure and refined OS, free Active Backup, operational simplicity. A no-regret choice for 80% of SMEs.

Media studio / heavy video surveillance

→ QNAP TVS / TS-h

Powerful hardware + accessible 10 GbE + GPU transcoding. Heavy surveillance.

Budget-constrained SME, self-sufficient IT team

→ Asustor Lockerstor

Unbeatable price/performance ratio, 3-year warranty, all the essential features present.

How these products were selected

No independent laboratory tests NAS units in this range, and none of the three vendors appears in the ANSSI catalogue or the Common Criteria register. The selection therefore rests on availability through professional distribution in France and on the machines we deploy ourselves. The sources below only cover vulnerability tracking.

  1. 1.Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Synology, CERTFR-2026-AVI-0491, CERT-FR, 2026-04-24, checked 2026-09-09.CERT-FR tracks and publishes Synology DSM vulnerabilities. An advisory is a tracking signal, not a recommendation.
  2. 2.Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits QNAP, CERTFR-2026-AVI-0762, CERT-FR, 2026-06-17, checked 2026-09-09.The same tracking for QNAP products.

Vendor pricing changes without notice: the check date says when we last looked. Spotted an error or a source worth adding? Write to us and the page is corrected.

Choosing + sizing + deploying an SME NAS?

Capacity + RAID + 3-2-1-1-0 backup calculation + network integration + training. Audit + recommendation + delivery + deployment.